Blog & News
New Brief Examines Collection and Availability of Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Immigrant Groups in Federal Surveys
September 09, 2021:Measurement of race, ethnicity, and immigration (REI) status is a critical component of research used to inform policy. However, the standards for measuring these concepts are often confusing for analysts. A new SHADAC brief aims to assist state and federal analysts with survey development and/or analysis of existing survey data to generate estimates of health insurance coverage and access to care across racial and ethnic groups and according to nativity and/or immigrant status.
Survey Background
The new brief presents the collection and classification of survey data for populations defined by race, ethnicity, and nativity/immigrant (REI) status as well as the availability of these data in public use files. We focus in particular on surveys that are conducted by federal agencies and that collect information about health insurance coverage and access to care on an annual or periodic basis for the general population of the United States. Because policy decisions and funding priorities are typically made at the state and local level, the brief emphasizes federal sources that afford state-level estimates as well.
The table below lists the surveys included in the brief, the federal agency responsible for each survey, and whether national and state estimates are available.
Survey | Federal Agency | National Estimates |
State Estimates |
American Community Survey (ACS) | Census Bureau | Yes | Yes |
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) | Yes | Yes |
Current Population Survey (CPS) | Census Bureau | Yes | Yes |
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey – Household Component (MEPS) | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) | Yes | No |
National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) | National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) | Yes | No |
National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) | Census Bureau | Yes | Yes |
Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) | Census Bureau | Yes | Yes |
While all these surveys must adhere to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards for the collection and classification of race and ethnicity in federal surveys, the organizations conducting each survey implement these guidelines differently, resulting in race and ethnicity data that are not always comparable across surveys. In addition, differing design components in these surveys such as target population, sample design and size, and year and frequency of data collection, also account for comparison difficulties.
An Illustration of Measurement Variation: Ethnicity Measures
Ethnicity Group Categories Collected in Selected Federal Surveys | ||||||||
Ethnicity Group | ACS | BRFSS | CPS | MEPS | NHIS | NSCH | SIPP | |
2019 | 2019 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | 2018 | ||
Not Hispanic or Latino | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Hispanic or Latino | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Mexican, Mexican-Am., Chicano | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Mexican | X | X | X | |||||
Mexican-American | X | X | ||||||
Chicano | X | X | ||||||
Puerto Rican | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Cuban/Cuban-American | X | |||||||
Cuban | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Cuban-American | X | X | ||||||
Dominican (Republic) | X* | X* | X | X | ||||
Central or South American | X | |||||||
Central American | X | |||||||
Central American, exc. Salv. | X* | |||||||
Costa Rican | X* | |||||||
Guatemalan | X* | |||||||
Honduran | X* | |||||||
Nicaraguan | X* | |||||||
Panamanian | X* | |||||||
Salvadoran | X* | X* | ||||||
Other Central American | X* | |||||||
South American | X* | X | ||||||
Argentinean | X* | |||||||
Bolivian | X* | |||||||
Chilean | X* | |||||||
Colombian | X* | |||||||
Ecuadorian | X* | |||||||
Paraguayan | X* | |||||||
Peruvian | X* | |||||||
Uruguayan | X* | |||||||
Venezuelan | X* | |||||||
Other South American | X* | |||||||
Spaniard | X* | |||||||
Other Latin American | X | |||||||
Other Hispanic/Latino/Spanish | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Multiple Categories Allowed | X | X | X | X | ||||
Other Category Specified | X | X | X | X | ||||
*Asterisks denote categories that are not specified in survey questions but are reported as open-ended “other” responses. |
The differential implementation of OMB standards can be seen in the measurement of ethnicity across the seven surveys included in this brief. In federal surveys, “ethnicity” refers specifically to Hispanic ethnicity. The minimum OMB standard for collecting data on ethnicity includes the options: 1) Hispanic/Latino or 2) Not Hispanic/Latino. All seven surveys ask about Hispanic or Latino origin—and in some cases, Spanish as well—using three main formulations for the ethnicity question: whether the respondent is of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin; what Hispanic/Latino group represents the respondent’s ethnic background; or whether the person considers themselves to be Hispanic or Latino. All seven surveys also include further identifying categories of Hispanic origin as a follow-up question to the primary ethnicity question.
State and Local Level Data
Also included in this new brief are sample sizes for selected REI groups by state for the five surveys that contain state identifiers in their public use files (ACS, BRFSS, CPS, NSCH, and SIPP). However, it is important to note that sample sizes for racial, ethnic, or immigrant groups vary depending on the state or the REI group of interest. Even with publicly available geographic identifiers, the sample sizes for specific REI groups at lower levels of geography may be too small to produce reliable estimates. For example, the BRFSS has a relatively large national 2019 sample of American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) (n=6,639) and Asian (n=8,531) subpopulations. However, there are only 170 AIAN and 287 Asian respondents in the 2019 sample for Minnesota, precluding comprehensive research on health equity for these groups in this state that has a large Asian population and one of the larger American Indian populations.
Download a PDF of the brief for further information.
Related Reading
Collection of Race, Ethnicity, Language (REL) Data in Medicaid Applications
State Health and Value Strategies Brief by SHADAC, 2021
Blog & News
New SHADAC Brief Looks at Changes in Federal Surveys During COVID Pandemic
August 27, 2021:The impacts of the coronavirus pandemic have been far ranging—on education, work, healthcare, and almost every other aspect of daily life. However, another effect of COVID that is just now coming to light is the interruption of data collection processes and falling response rates for yearly federal surveys that, among other measures, provide estimates of health insurance coverage for the United States population. Such surveys would, under normal circumstances, be ideally suited to measure changes to insurance coverage during such a tumultuous time.
In a new brief, SHADAC summarizes COVID-era changes and challenges for four major federal surveys—the American Community Survey (ACS), the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)—such as shifting in-person collection methods to phone and email, adding COVID-related questions to questionnaires, extending survey fielding in order to address falling response rates, and delayed data release dates, among others.
All four surveys made significant changes to their Survey Operations:
In-person: The ACS, CPS, and NHIS all suspended in-person operations from March to June 2020, with limited in-person interviews resuming in either July or September 2020. The MEPS Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) suspended in-person interviews entirely.
Mailing: Mailing centers for the ACS and the CPS were shut down in March 2020, but re-opened with limited staffing in July 2020, allowing previously completed surveys to be collected and counted. The MEPS Household Component (MEPS-HC) shifted to dual web-and-mailing collection methods in the fall of 2020 while the MEPS-IC shifted to dual web-and-phone data collection at that time.
Telephone: All surveys (ACS, CPS, MEPS-HC and MEPS-IC, and NHIS) shifted to phone-only surveys while in-person fielding was shut down, or while mailing operations were suspended, in the case of the MEPS-IC.
Web: While both the MEPS-HC and MEPS-IC took a different direction and shifted to telephone-only survey collection in March 2020, the former proposed a shift to dual web-and-mailing data collection modes while the latter opted to shift to dual web-and-phone methods in the fall of 2020.
Three surveys made changes to their Questionnaires:
The ACS and the MEPS-IC opted not make any changes to their questionnaires in response to COVID-19.
The CPS added five new questions regarding COVID’s impact on employment to the questionnaire. The NHIS similarly added new questions to its survey form, but instead asked respondents about COVID testing, contraction and symptoms, and prevention measures.
The MEPS-HC was the only survey to create an entirely new questionnaire: the “Social and Health Experiences” survey, which asked respondents about changes or delays in care due to COVID.
Each survey experienced falling Response Rates:
Where they were able to be measured, survey response rates dropped significantly. Neither the MEPS-HC nor the NHIS has yet released response rates for 2020, but previous years show a drop in response rates for the latter survey of 20 percentage points (80 percent in 2018 to 60 percent in 2019). Both the ACS and CPS saw falling response rates between 2019 and 2020. The ACS dropped 15 percentage points (86 percent in 2019 to 71 percent in 2020), while the CPS fell by roughly 6 percentage points (67.6 percent in 2019 to 61.1 percent in 2020). The MEPS-IC saw a smaller decrease between the years, from 59.6 percent in 2019 to 56.1 percent in 2020.
SHADAC plans to continue monitoring reported changes to these and other federal surveys in 2020, and continuing into 2021 where applicable. As data from 2020 becomes available, our researchers will continue to produce resources to explain what effects these adaptations may have for understanding the data, and if alternative sources may provide ways to fill in gaps where 2020 data may be incomplete or unable to be reliably used.
Publication
Changes in Federal Surveys Due to and During COVID-19 Brief
On a recent webinar, the U.S. Census Bureau made the announcement that they will not be releasing 2020 data from the American Community Survey (ACS) as usual in September. Instead, due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic, “experimental” estimates will be available in November. This substantial change to the data release of a major federal survey highlights one (among many) of the disruptive effects of the coronavirus—the interruption of data collection processes and falling response rates for yearly federal surveys.
Other federal agencies have made their own attempts at adapting surveys to address pandemic-related challenges: delaying data release dates, shifting in-person collection methods to phone and email, adding COVID-related questions to their questionnaire, canceling survey collection for the year, or even creating an entirely new survey, such as the Census Bureau’s new Household Pulse Survey (HPS).
A new brief from SHADAC summarizes these and other COVID-era changes and challenges for four major federal surveys—American Community Survey (ACS), Current Population Survey (CPS), Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)—and explains what effects these adaptations may have for understanding 2020 data as it becomes available.
For more announcements and information related to the 2020 ACS data release changes, visit our webpage.