SHADAC Expertise
Payment and Delivery System Reform
SHADAC researchers have a broad range of experience related to health care delivery system and payment reform, particularly in the context of state Medicaid programs. SHADAC has conducted quantitative research aimed at understanding the impacts of Medicaid payment and delivery system reform initiatives, e.g., accountable care organizations, on cost and quality; conducted qualitative research focused on innovative state Medicaid approaches to payment and health care delivery system reform; and provided technical assistance and evaluation support to states and other stakeholders through foundation and federally funded projects.
Related SHADAC work:
Click on any title below to learn more about the project.
Medical Home Contributions to Child Health Outcomes
SHADAC researchers Natalie Mac Arthur and Lynn Blewett published a journal article in Maternal and Child Health Journal that examines the medical home model—a widely accepted model of team-based primary care—and its unique contributions to child health outcomes. Their analysis drew on data from the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) to assess five key medical home components–usual source of care, personal doctor/nurse, family-centered care, referral access, and coordinated care–and their associations with child outcomes. Health outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, unmet health care needs, preventive medical visits, preventive dental visits, health status, and oral health status.
Accelerating the Use of Findings from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Clinical Practice to Improve Health and Health Care
A committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine hosted a series of public workshops to explore potential ways to accelerate the use of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) findings in clinical practice to improve health and health care. In the second workshop on June 17, 2022, SHADAC director Lynn Blewett presented "State-Level Data Collaborations and Opportunities to Improve the Sustainability of Their Efforts."
Inventory of Evaluations of Integrated Care Programs for Dually Eligible Beneficiaries
Both federal and state policymakers are interested in integrating care for beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid is a key priority for states and the federal government. A variety of models seek to do this, including the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly, the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI), Medicare Advantage dual eligible special needs plans, and fully integrated dual eligible special needs plans, managed long-term services and supports programs, and demonstrations that pre-dated the FAI. This inventory, conducted by SHADAC researchers under contract to MACPAC, compiles available evidence on how these integrated care programs have affected spending, quality, health outcomes, and access.
Past Work
Data to Inform Research on Integrated Care for Dual Eligibles
This report by SHADAC researchers Lacey Hartman and Elizabeth Lukanen, conducted with support from the Arnold Ventures Foundation, summarizes the findings of a systematic review of data sources that could be used to study the broad topic of integrated care for dual eligibles. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations aimed at addressing key data gaps and advancing the availability of comprehensive, high-quality data for research in this area. Along with the report, a companion Excel chart was produced that contains all abstraction details for each data source.
Minnesota Accountable Health Model Evaluation
SHADAC conducted the state evaluation of Minnesota’s State Innovation Model (SIM)—the Minnesota Accountable Health Model—for the Minnesota Department of Human Services and in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). SHADAC designed a formative evaluation assessing the state’s progress in achieving core goals related to the improvement of data analytics, expansion of e-health, practice transformation, accountable communities for health (ACH), and Accountable Care Organization (ACO) alignment related to performance measurement and payment. Using qualitative and quantitative methods, SHADAC collected and analyzed new and existing data to report on the implementation and outcomes. Ongoing document and literature review informed interview protocol and survey development as well as other data collection methods. A key component of the evaluation was to use the Minnesota All Payer Claims Database (MN APCD) to examine the impacts of the first two years of the Integrated Health Partnership (IHP) Medicaid ACO shared savings program.